Based on a simulation: 50% chance of three-week schedule delay; using the risk table, what is the correct Level and Schedule Impact?

Based on a simulation: 50% chance of three-week schedule delay; using the risk table, what is the correct Level and Schedule Impact?

• A. L = 2; Schedule Impact 3
• B. L = 3; Schedule Impact 4
• C. L = 4; Schedule Impact 2
• D. L = 5; Schedule Impact 5

Answer: (B)

This item tests how a risk table translates probability of occurrence and the magnitude of a schedule effect into numeric risk ratings. A 50% chance sits in the middle for likelihood, and in the risk table this mid-range likelihood is assigned a Level 3. A three-week delay is a significant schedule hit, and on the schedule-impact scale this magnitude is typically rated high (often a 4). When these two inputs are entered into the risk table, they map to a risk level of 3 and a Schedule Impact of 4, which is why the correct result is Level 3 with Schedule Impact 4. This combination communicates a moderate overall risk with a substantial effect on the schedule, signaling that mitigation should address both reducing likelihood and limiting impact where possible.

This item tests how a risk table translates probability of occurrence and the magnitude of a schedule effect into numeric risk ratings. A 50% chance sits in the middle for likelihood, and in the risk table this mid-range likelihood is assigned a Level 3. A three-week delay is a significant schedule hit, and on the schedule-impact scale this magnitude is typically rated high (often a 4). When these two inputs are entered into the risk table, they map to a risk level of 3 and a Schedule Impact of 4, which is why the correct result is Level 3 with Schedule Impact 4. This combination communicates a moderate overall risk with a substantial effect on the schedule, signaling that mitigation should address both reducing likelihood and limiting impact where possible.